Jekyll and Hugo are both popular static site generators that are widely used for creating websites. Both tools have their own strengths and weaknesses, so the best choice for you will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
One key difference between Jekyll and Hugo is the language they are written in. Jekyll is written in Ruby, while Hugo is written in Go. This means that Jekyll is typically easier to set up and use on a Mac or Linux machine, while Hugo may be a better choice if you're using Windows.
Another important difference is the speed at which each tool can generate a website. Hugo is known for its speed, with some users reporting build times of less than a second for small to medium-sized websites. In contrast, Jekyll can be slower, especially for larger sites.
One advantage of Jekyll is that it has a large and active community, with many plugins and themes available. This means that it's easier to find support and resources for Jekyll than for Hugo. In contrast, Hugo has a more limited ecosystem, but it also has a number of powerful features, such as the ability to generate a website from multiple source formats.
In general, both Jekyll and Hugo are excellent choices for creating static websites. The best choice for you will depend on your specific needs and preferences.